技术团队知识多样性及其对创新绩效的影响研究

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2023.10.001

情报学报

2023, Vol. 42

Issue (10): 1139-1150 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2023.10.001

情报理论与方法

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

技术团队知识多样性及其对创新绩效的影响研究

石静¹, 孙建军^1,2

1.南京大学信息管理学院，南京 210023
2.南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室，南京 210023

Knowledge Diversity and Its Influence on Technical Team Innovation Performance

Shi Jing¹, Sun Jianjun^1,2

1.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
2.Laboratory for Data Intelligence and Cross-Innovation of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (2905 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要团队创新是“大科技时代”的显著特征。过去关于科学团队创新过程的研究较多，但对技术团队创新的关注不足，关于技术团队知识多样性及其对创新绩效的影响仍不清晰。本文考量技术团队的特征，提出一种新方法用于识别团队，进而构建团队知识网络、测度知识多样性，从创新数量、创新质量、创新广度3个维度探究其对团队创新绩效的影响。研究结果发现，知识多样性可以在上述3个维度显著提升技术团队的创新绩效。当以创新数量为目标时，大团队更能发挥知识多样性的正向效应；但当侧重创新成果的新颖性和创造性时，小团队中知识多样性对创新绩效的提升更明显。本文的研究结论，一方面，可以与科学团队相关研究形成对话，帮助理解科学团队与技术团队在创新过程中的不同特征与机制；另一方面，可以辅助技术研发主体与管理者参照创新目标合理配置资源，以实现理想的创新绩效。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	石静
	孙建军

关键词 ：技术研发, 团队创新, 知识多样性, 创新绩效

收稿日期: 2022-09-06

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“引文扩散理论及实证研究”（71874077）；江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“科技创新团队知识多样性及其对创新绩效的影响研究”（KYCX21_0025）。

作者简介: 石静，女，1995年生，博士研究生，研究领域为交叉创新与知识发现；孙建军，通信作者，男，1962年生，教授，博士生导师，研究领域为网络信息资源管理、大数据分析，E-mail：sjj@nju.edu.cn；

引用本文:

石静, 孙建军. 技术团队知识多样性及其对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(10): 1139-1150.
Shi Jing, Sun Jianjun. Knowledge Diversity and Its Influence on Technical Team Innovation Performance. 情报学报, 2023, 42(10): 1139-1150.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2023.10.001 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2023/V42/I10/1139

1 Hunter L, Leahey E. Collaborative research in sociology: trends and contributing factors[J]. The American Sociologist, 2008, 39(4): 290-306.
2 Wuchty S, Jones B F, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5827): 1036-1039.
3 Leahey E. From sole investigator to team scientist: trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2016, 42(1): 81-100.
4 Guimerà R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, et al. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance[J]. Science, 2005, 308(5722): 697-702.
5 张华夏, 张志林. 从科学与技术的划界来看技术哲学的研究纲领[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2001, 17(2): 31-36.
6 de Solla Price D J. Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography[J]. Technology and Culture, 1965, 6(4): 553-568.
7 Salas E, Dickinson T L, Converse S, et al. Toward an understanding of team performance and training[M]// Teams: Their Training and Performance. Norwood: Ablex Publishing, 1992: 3-29.
8 Lovelace K, Shapiro D L, Weingart L R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(4): 779-793.
9 郑小勇, 楼鞅. 科研团队创新绩效的影响因素及其作用机理研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(9): 1428-1438.
10 D?biaggio L, Nasiriyar M, Nesta L. The organization of the knowledge base and inventive performance[M]// Innovation and IT in an International Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014: 47-64.
11 Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
12 Bell S T, Villado A J, Lukasik M A, et al. Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(3): 709-743.
13 Moreira S, Markus A, Laursen K. Knowledge diversity and coordination: the effect of intrafirm inventor task networks on absorption speed[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(9): 2517-2546.
14 Shin S J, Zhou J. When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(6): 1709-1721.
15 Reagans R, Zuckerman E W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams[J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12(4): 502-517.
16 张景焕, 刘欣, 任菲菲, 等. 团队多样性与组织支持对团队创造力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1551-1560.
17 邓今朝, 王重鸣. 团队多样性对知识共享的反向作用机制研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2008, 26(6): 25-27, 53.
18 Martínez-Plumed F, Barredo P, Héigeartaigh S ó, et al. Research community dynamics behind popular AI benchmarks[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3(7): 581-589.
19 石静, 孙建军. 科技创新团队的知识网络构建与知识测度研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(9): 900-914.
20 Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382.
21 Harrison D A, Klein K J. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4): 1199-1228.
22 Scherer F M. Using linked patent data and R&D data to measure Interindustry technology flows[M]// R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984: 417-464.
23 Quatraro F. Knowledge coherence, variety and economic growth: manufacturing evidence from Italian regions[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(10): 1289-1302.
24 乔舒亚·安格里斯特, 约恩-斯特芬·皮施克. 基本无害的计量经济学: 实证研究者指南[M]. 郎金焕, 李井奎, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2021: 59-60.
25 Hsiehchen D, Espinoza M, Hsieh A. Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research[J]. Science Advances, 2015, 1(8): e1500211.
26 Bruns S B, Kalthaus M. Flexibility in the selection of patent counts: implications for p-hacking and evidence-based policymaking[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(1): 103877.